Zeljko Vrba wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
But the work needs to be moved into gpg-agent... :(
You were referring to my PKCS#11 patch.. After studying the GPG
architecture a bit, I think this needs to be moved into the scdaemon.
gpg-agent actually does nothing with smart-cards - it uses scdaemon to
do the work.
Which is good, since the scdaemon's work is pretty simple; much simpler
than that of gpg-agent's.
The communication PROTOCOL (not API!) is publicly defined and is
UNIX-socket based. I believe that writing a BSD-licensed PKCS#11 version
of scdaemon is feasible. Then you use the 'p11-scdaemon' (let's call it
that way) instead of the gpg's and voila! You have PKCS#11 support.
Opinions?
Great! Super! Amazing!
If you can do it with a little effort I will glad to check and
use it.
But after looking at the source... it does not looked like a
very simple interface...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
