David Shaw wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Hideki Saito wrote:Hello, How will version number convention will continue, as there are 1.4.x and 2.0.x lines concurrently running?1.4.x line will be evolving on its own separately from 2.0.x line, right?Just curious, because now it is at 1.4.9 and 2.0.9...Not exactly evolving on its own. 1.4.x is not about to grow S/MIME capabilities like 2.0.x, but some changes will certainly apply to both.From user's perspective, I think 1.4.x should be called something likeGnuPG Standalone, instead of having two different version numbers... Well, I guess some programs go like 1.4.10, 2.0.10, etc., so this may not be relevant at all!Do people find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x thing confusing? David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
