Dear Robert. On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 21:41 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Yes: that's the point I was making. Regular users are taught to think > this. This is generally true. GnuPG is not following the regular > versioning conventions. Uhm what I mainly wonder is,... what is the main difference between those two? Ok CMS support but that's not a difference between the shared codebase, is it? So in my opinion there are only rare cases where it's justified to have different continuing branches (which are actually like forks). One example is perhaps flex and flex-old..
Best wishes, Chris. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
