Faramir wrote: > Don't worry, while I like to change some settings, I also like to > "play safe". Even if I could use Camellia, I would not use it to send > messages (maybe it would be interesting to be able to receive messages > encrypted with it).
There's no real reason to avoid Camellia, by the way. It's a trusted algorithm, cryppies have a lot of confidence in it -- I'm just part of the (vocal) minority which screams that OpenPGP has way too many algorithms and we need to start cutting algorithms out. I would like GnuPG a lot more if it only supported 3DES, SHA-1, SHA256, and DSA/ELG keypairs in 1k and 2k sizes. There is a (less vocal) majority which seems to think I am crazy, though. :) _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
