On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:49:41AM -0300, Faramir wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > El 26-02-2011 0:27, Aaron Toponce escribió: > > On 02/25/2011 07:39 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > >> Bruce himself recommends AES over TWOFISH. > > > > [citation needed] > > > > I know that he's recommended AES-128 over AES-256, but I've not read > > where he's recommended AES over TWOFISH. > > There is an interview somewhere (I was looking for it to provide > citation, but I was unable to find it. I think it used to be in his blog).
This one[1]? It doesn’t mention AES though… The topic was discussed on this list a couple of years ago (and probably many other times)[2]. [1]: http://www.schneier.com/news-048.html [2]: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-September/034622.html Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
