-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:57:43 +0200 Ludwig Hügelschäfer articulated:
> Jerry wrote on 28.10.11 16:36: > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:07:53 +0100 (BST) Phil Brooke articulated: > > >> Nothing relating to encrypted data, but I've seen an MS Exchange > >> system rewrite signed emails (both PGP/MIME and S/MIME) with the > >> obvious effect of causing failed verifications. > > > > Could you please supply proof of that statement. An example of the > > message before and after it was processed by the server would be > > advantageous. > > http://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=425 > > This holds true in my daily life at my company. Does this hold true with the latest version of Exchange or is it limited to the <=2007 version? - -- Jerry ✌ gnupg.u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOqxt4AAoJEHnO4vtcDeotV6UH/ArgMH/MLhv/9OFOaJ2q3u7y IDpN58ZIaOj9+QKbUtFqLzYDba8XZDutkRxbg721KIUD8I1+ka8YGnfcrcX3EGnt appDKNr46bafWAooopjKNuWTfID2Cm4ZFiUA/cj4O7wfQ5Xjk2gT9z7WRK8GXnb2 jK9NMUgQ/xvqG2cLK8WRTsSzpevE+fa0NM9jygGo+acjrrvy6suWahLcrdiO8Vbd WEPHofl0T4w6VaK+47KX16fY9iZCc4Mpl0c0A8vQRUy5qaiFHXZn/6wBCarGPSAE bHVyHD7HAlpcIU/lPuTUBS8wOJEimGLFV1VnNIMK9FTmeCc7wCowa3641iKjkKg= =eZhN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users