Hi,

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Werner Koch wrote:
Obviously there are some kludges in the system to allow sending of signed messages by taking great care not to modify the content.

A remark on these kludges: an S/MIME email from a colleague elsewhere using Outlook and their Exchange server was still mangled by our Exchange server. Sending to their Exchange server (avoiding our Exchange server) didn't exhibit the same characteristics. I would have hoped that staying entirely within one vendor's tools really should work.

The trigger in both this case (and the example emails I sent earlier) appears to be attachments.

Overall, it makes signed emails just so unreliable. But I guess we already knew that.

Cheers,

Phil.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to