On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote: > By the way: if we had a working alternative to SSL/TLS, all the mail > servers could talk to eachother securely without eavesdropping. That way
Please remind me why we need an alternative to TLS. > the contents of e-mails is only exposed on the sending SMTP server and > the receiving SMTP and mailbox servers (f.e., IMAP). The mailbox server I treat hop-by-hop encryption, not as an alternative to end-to-end, but as defense in depth. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [email protected] Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
