-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 13 October 2014 at 5:40:06 PM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Peter Lebbing wrote: > However, "public key" is ill-defined without context. > It can also refer to the whole thing with UID's and > signatures and so on, which is not what I mean in this > context. I would have thought "the whole thing with UID's and signatures and so on" was exactly what was being revoked by means of a revocation certificate. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:[email protected] Nothing a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster won't cure! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlQ8K+5XFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pPUgEAKhhiWOg/bjLR91Vj5PrrCp6wb1OnwxxkjHO DjkNfRIo85QMHtRqCokOf7WUwZcCF6XdcYGZlw8RLDzjDWuosPvdNaOTcce6tdbZ huc9K7sfbULi0aextMVcnbTSP8Wq9UAaWBnvyzL9TajeCYombE1iMWm7bNSj3fzg /A6a6gRT =O7NI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
