-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 at 10:05:18 AM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Peter Lebbing wrote: > So in that sense the revocation certificate is not > bound to the UID's as I stated. However, it does also > revoke the UID's in the sense you mean. > Does this make sense? Yes. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:[email protected] People who throw kisses are hopelessly lazy. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlQ9ephXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pE/0D/0GwvxMbCI56Oz/FlyTfvLEii/QIfCRAY1PG LLosrFnhwthv0kO8hU0KMH4OPsFq+3p0J1hV+H7gGLli2m5mF3viMzdBn/yZAk1t qZsoJS5FRwsc/KUIbkNVMZedfiQRzox/NjvrorCpbKPHHW96WJsa37WtkFDYAG9c HodDpPEX =ETF4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
