On 03/25/2015 08:41 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/25/15 11:08 AM, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote: >> Doug, >> Signature shows as an attachment "signature.asc". No evidence that PGP >> actions were envoked. Work forces use of Synaptic PGP, so I cannot >> tell if it is verified or not. > > Thanks Bob, that is interesting feedback. > > FWIW, I have received various other messages privately from people who > have said the same thing ... They can see the attachment, but either > message verification fails, or there is no indication on their side that > it is a PGP-signed message at all. > > While this is strictly anecdotal evidence I would argue that it's a good > indication that we may not be ready for PGP/MIME as the default.
It looks like this is caused by the mailing list software (mailman). Mailman adds a banner to the mail and therefore the mail is no longer a valid PGP/MIME mail. I think mailman should be smart enough not to mess with digitally signed mail (same thing happens with S/MIME signed email). Kind regards, Martijn Brinkers -- CipherMail email encryption Open source email encryption gateway with support for S/MIME, OpenPGP and PDF messaging. http://www.ciphermail.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/CipherMail _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users