-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I think this is the crux of your issue. It sounds like > a bug to me. > I've opened a bug report about it: > https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1967 Do you think a notification should be displayed, something like "Signing subkey 0x01234567 not available. Creating signature using key 0x89abcdef instead"? - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:[email protected]> There is no snooze button for a cat that wants breakfast -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVRfn8XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwbHEIAItqDXrCV+43jQJgAm1AKpCO NG8vXiz7pXnGMCGsaj13LCjx7lHL+BC6Xjm2Y2uRrnK9ZXWWQuwft6j2ZGX+lOi/ KcTBFIy6xRp5rZaXkzGRKb0kZkZJcIJ7r3AuNux/i041KIuYTgRgSGhdqvrSjlah giQwFYb4z57Y5RR2+O8E+q7J1IkLd5S0MU52kabCnHVbFyGfpvHNfjVAmMDwrWC2 Sj8q12R6nQYDihSMP+J4D+dJP31dF/X0ZjTdTarmqC+uCl4hvjaJsoGMbdDU0Kcd zYR/uLwyFXS1omflBCzoHes97RUw5UHandNZSoBQeatVGLRDHeWyvc0B19MLZtiI vgQBFgoAZgUCVUX6EV8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45NVmAQCap2W8TOjOgkQUnlW7LgxGlrpt /OFoJ1SAwb8bDfaswAEAmH4z+bfPonScJMhk/jFOp2D5eN7U68Rci+6y/bGU5Qk= =fFLm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
