On 05/03/2015 01:16 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sun 2015-05-03 06:35:37 -0400, MFPA wrote: >> On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in >> <mid:[email protected]>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> >>> https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1967 >> >> Do you think a notification should be displayed, something like >> "Signing subkey 0x01234567 not available. Creating signature using key >> 0x89abcdef instead"? > > I don't have much of a preference. Such a message should probably > appear if the user has asked for --debug-level basic at least, though. > > --dkg >
I agree with a debug message. But in general I don't think a notification is so important because the selection algorithm is arbitrary anyway. E.g., why not strongest rather than newest?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
