On Thu 2015-05-21 12:23:20 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Which key does he claim to have broken? If Mircea has broken your > encryption-capable subkey (0xB8A6B74C001892C2) then he might only be > able to decrypt messages sent to you, but not sign them. > > To provide him with an opportunity to demonstrate this (Hi Mircea!), > i've produced this message, encrypted to rjh's encryption-capable > subkey. > > Mircea, if you can decrypt it, you should find a secret message, signed > by me, which includes within it the message-id of the e-mail i'm > replying to.
I've been informed by Mircea offlist that he has no interest in continuing this conversation, so i'm dropping him from CC here. It appears to me that he has nothing concrete to demonstrate, and he has shown an inability to correct factual errors he has already published. Not very impressive :( I think there's nothing interesting to see here, but if i hear anything more substantive, i'll be sure to follow up on this thread to let people know. Regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
