On 22/05/2015 5:00 pm, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2015 23:58, [email protected] said: > >> Is it possible that a keyserver running the old, buggy PKS code >> (v. 0.9.something) mangled these keys? > > Yes, but that won't explain why the key binding signature is valid.
Okay, there's clearly some deeply weird stuff happening with those keys, or rather, has happened to them. Has anyone identified the pattern in the screenshots at the top of the list of ~160-170 UIDs? Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
