On 22/05/2015 5:21 am, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2015-05-21 11:59:07 -0400, mofo syne wrote: >> You might see a few copies around. This one is edited and streamlined with >> some advice from Hasimir to help keep this proposal focused. This is >> mirrored in here >> <http://www.reddit.com/r/GnuPG/comments/36lmih/i_wonder_if_there_is_a_gpg_uri/> > > This proposal appears to be trying to do a lot of different things. I'm > not convinced that they are all reasonable goals, or that gnupg-users is > the right mailing list to discuss them on. The [email protected] is a > mailing list where different people discuss the standard in general.
Bringing it here is pretty much my fault, I suggested here rather than the IETF list because he's relatively new and had just wandered into #gpg4win to ask about views of a previous draft on reddit. I suggested bringing it here to "kick the tyres" without going straight to full Internet standard level over in IETF-land. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
