-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 29 October 2015 at 9:28:54 PM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > Unfortunately, it doesn't. This is because there is > currently no standard way to communicate the id of the > new key. I've proposed a solution for this Wouldn't a signature notation (in a self-signature) be sufficient for this? Something like:- [email protected]=[fingerprint] And for key transition statements, perhaps a second notation:- [email protected]=[URL] - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:[email protected]> Versifiers write poems for it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWM1gGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwpLcH+wW+rpDMLZiYJnRlvEX/Eil6 V/3LvPvx0HPlY2Khe8xF9tlm+/QDhG9D3b2higZq6KEB5PAYrXIwmAUokNf9uRt2 G++ZGzRtjD1vCD97PDlwf2E7UQm3N0CM7Z8tgaGPworqXYuJJOSGVXcRP/rRQp1L ikfFxtCgZDE9c+3VJGDTGh1Pf1dFQvnsjllh0q1pYi4nrX4ZRZ+mEfuGMJXIjLwK 2pCBf/gUQezeCUCF9XwBlGRRHdMp6o64GHJbp5aZLFqr6vvH4pn9HkMUKnY5zRnc m2kxOstix9yrfDQckao/VThb3MKFPTNDM++lfCJK5Tc2T7fOU6EZOmeaaOL8uYyI vgQBFgoAZgUCVjNYDV8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45GhkAQCLLEsCe5cZL4XPoZF3nTIBIFyL dycllokt1e67PovWPgEAjmYeoT0I57iQ8tOTVmq7gjslYXNaBsc/FzcVXYht8wE= =Bnqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
