At Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:43:28 +0000, MFPA wrote: > On Thursday 29 October 2015 at 9:28:54 PM, in > <mid:87611p8iuh.wl-n...@walfield.org>, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, it doesn't. This is because there is > > currently no standard way to communicate the id of the > > new key. I've proposed a solution for this > > Wouldn't a signature notation (in a self-signature) be sufficient for > this? Something like:- > > new...@domain.example.com=[fingerprint] > > And for key transition statements, perhaps a second notation:- > > transitionstatem...@domain.example.com=[URL]
Sure. But your point is a red herring. There is *currently* no way to do this. However, the next version of the OpenPGP spec should have a way to do this. Neal _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users