On 01/16/2018 06:05 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 16/01/18 17:47, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> I'm somewhat interested in hearing how this scheme would work in the >> case of a compromised private key. Mainly; > I was merely using the description of the basics of it as a means to > show how it would be access control rather than DRM.
I'd personally agree that the whole right to be forgotten EU is talking about is a form of DRM, whereby they want individuals to be able to wipe out any trace of their historical behavior after said behavior has been published / happened, but through legal means rather than a technical restriction. Actually there are many aspects of GDPR that is quite hostile to both free speech and businesses. I would agree access control would be relevant up to the point that the information is public to begin with. <rant> in the current state EU seems to be building strongly on roots of left-wing bias and a liberal's wet dream of a society. /me goes back to re-reading the Fountainhead and dreams of a world where people have principles and take responsibility for their actions... :) </rant> -- ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 ---------------------------- "If your kids are giving you a headache, follow the directions on the aspirin bottle, especially the part that says "keep away from children." (Neil McElroy)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users