Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 13:34 -0500, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote: > > > > On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users" > > <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > > > > I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG, > > > where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor > > > output. > > > > ===== > > > > It would not be compatible with older versions. > > > > The simplest thing for you, (or any users who prefer the aesthetics of a > > particular custom line width), would be to first make the GnuPG ascii > > armored message, then change it as you want to and copy, paste, and post, > > with a little note of how to change it back for verification. > > > > Why 'change it back'? Unless I'm mistaken, GPG shouldn't have any real > problem with a different base64 width, as long as the overall layout is > preserved. I've just did a quick test and GPG is entirely happy with > the result after rewrapping at 50 chars, as well as after cheap > rewrapping with uneven lines.
Just did a quick test ... :-) -----BEGIN PGP ARMORED FILE----- Comment: Use "gpg --dearmor" for unpacking VGhhbmtzIGZvciBwb2ludGluZyB0aGF0IG91dCEgSG VyZSBpcyBhIHF1aWNrCnRlc3Qgc2hvd2luZyB0aGF0 IGl0IHdvcmtzLgoKUmVnYXJkcwpTdGVmYW4K=cex4 -----END PGP ARMORED FILE----- Regards Stefan -- Signal (Desktop) +4915126058973 https://keybase.io/stefan_claas _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users