It is irrelevant whether you form a group.
I certainly do not form a mathematical group: while I have an identity and I associate, I lack an inverse. :)
Your argument equates to "PQC breaks RSA".
I'm not making an argument. I'm only asking a question. You're asserting your layering scheme is safe. If it's safe it should not form a group under functional composition, and that can be demonstrated mathematically. It appears you can't demonstrate it, and that leads me to grave doubts about whether to take you seriously.
One of the orgs who would have the most to gain by misleading the public as to the timelines, so that they might 1.Gain an advantage early; 2. Keep it a secret; and 3. Delay the advantage being eliminated through the normal course of technological advancement.
They would have even more to lose. I don't think you understand their COMSEC mission. -- At this point, I'm opting out. What I aimed to demonstrate, I've demonstrated. Peace. Feel free to take the last word, if you like.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
