On 31 May 2026, at 03:06, marqueandreprisal--- via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> wrote: > > No you are wrong it is not a minor bug I do not agree with you. The ability > to revoke keys is a major feature therefor it is a major bug
Your key *is* revoked though. The fact that it doesn’t explicitly say that the subkey is revoked is a minor issue because subkeys should not be used when their primary key is revoked. > when you read about gen-revoke in the context of Michael's blog you will see > this major bug would break a massive system of automation for which is the > ideal use of a subkey system. I haven’t seen those posts. But if you have an automation system that can use a subkey when its primary key is hard revoked, then there is a bug in that automation system. > With your favoritism of bugs I wouldn't be quick to pick LibrePGP while you > are the developer. What other options have I? You are mixing me up with somebody else. A _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
