Am 05. Mar 2009, um 11:23:14 schrieb Erast Benson:
Hi,

> > I'm working on some of the mail-related packages, and found some issues
> > that I would like to ask which the better way for a fix would be.
> > 
> > a) fetchmail doesnt build because it can not find krb5-config.
> >    It can not find it because the sunw kerberos one is in /usr/sun/bin,
> >    which is not in its path.
> >    It can not find the Ubuntu one because when porting that package, its
> >    name was changed to libkrb5-config.
> 
> situation with libkrb5 is currently not cleared up yet. I'm voting for
> OpenSolaris krb5 - to be a default in Nexenta. This would preserver
> compatibility with OpenSolaris distros. The ubuntu packages which are
> using krb5 are 99% autoconf/automake aware and should be able to detect
> OpenSolaris diffs.
... if the proper krb5-config is in $PATH. Witness the practical problem
is fetchmail, and it can do with either krb5.

> if we would have krb5 as I suggested above - the issue wouldn't exists.

Yeah, but someone has to make the decision. I am too new to it to do it.

> > b) mutt does not build because the permissions of /var/mail differ from
> >    ubuntu. (sun var/mail has more lenient permissions, hence the configure
> >    stage thinks it can do without the mutt dotlock helper, and doesnt
> >    compile it, and the packaging stage wants to pack it in...
> > 
> >    Again, this has to be fixed in either the sun package owning
> >    /var/mail, or the mutt (and possibly other) packages...
> 
> I'll try to fix that in sunwcsr. What's the permission it needs to be?

root:mail 2775. But the best would be if you just omitted it, and let
base-files take care of it, which it would if it not already existed.
btw, rmail is another of those conflicts; at least it is one of the
(whole plethora of) issues with postfix.

> > c) Is there an overriding rationale on when to use Sun userspace vs.
> >    Ubuntu userspace ? sendmail, rmail etc. come to mind as examples
> >    where this happens...
> 
> I would prefer to keep OpenSolaris stuff and provide an alternative for
> Ubuntu ones.

I guess I would prefer ubuntu as a baseline, if only for the reason that
all packages that possibly are ported likely have debianish/linuxish
expectations. For instance, I still find myself calling ps twice,
because the first time it complains -axu aint there. Thank god killall
nowadays insists on a signame :)
Then again, I dont have enough karma yet to vote on this...

Mario

_______________________________________________
gnusol-devel mailing list
gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel

Reply via email to