On 21.11.2007, at 18:58, Tim Dobson wrote: > replace licence with foundation; yes, I made an error, i'm sorry if > you are offended; no need to ridicule :) Sorry. That was not the intent. I meant that the claim didn't make sense even if you looked past the "foundation" mistake, and the rest of the mail was my reasoning for it. I do tend to be impulsive, and you really seemed to be backing up all the worst fears of FSF/GPL- bashers. :/
> I stand corrected, you are right, this was not the general impression > I had got and I regret that I expressed incorrect statements as facts > and am happy to clear that up :) Yay! :) That's what really matters, right? > I would prefer you did not refer to *my* preference to FSF written > licences as bloody mindedness, though this of course may be the case > for other people. Sorry. The reference was provoked by the baselessness of your arguments, which provoked me. It really sends the wrong message about the FSF when people talk about it like this, because it perpetuates a common misconception of the FSF and its supporters as dogmatic GPL- heads... With greetings, Herbert Snorrason _______________________________________________ gnusol-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-users
