On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Helge Hess wrote:
On Sep 7, 2006, at 19:11, Adrian Robert wrote:
This is probably best for simplification as you say but it will
impose a cost to switching back and forth between, e.g., profiled
and non-profiled versions.
Do you actually use profiling with gprof? I've always used
KCachegrind in the last few years instead. So IMHO its superflous
anyway.
Actually, no. My main encounter with switching was between debug+no
optimization and non-debug+optimization. But the profiling case
sounded like a more legitimate example. :-}
Anyway I don't have a strong preference, just wanted to raise the
possible issue.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
