Er. Dammit... when I type too fast I always screw up. :) *I* agree with what Andy is saying below.
Thanks, GJC --Gregory Casamento ----- Original Message ---- From: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2006 11:39:05 PM Subject: Re: Removing all remaining distinction between shared, debug, profile and static libs/executables I'm agree with what Andy is saying. Later, GJC --Gregory Casamento ----- Original Message ---- From: Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2006 11:09:51 PM Subject: Re: Removing all remaining distinction between shared, debug, profile and static libs/executables On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Nicola Pero wrote: > Anyway, if anyone has any comments before I do all this simplification, > please let me know :-) I'm very much for this change. However, why not go one step further and have the -g standard? If you want non-debug versions you just do make strip=yes or something similar. With all the people compiling gnustep source anyways, why not leverage the ability to have backtraces on almost everybody with problems? The distros can do the stripping if they want... - Andy -- Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.aeruder.net _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
