Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
> Author: rfm
> Date: Mon Nov 13 18:07:10 2006
> New Revision: 24082
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=24082&view=rev
> Log:
> clean up and add a few more tests
>
> Modified:
> tests/testsuite/trunk/ChangeLog
> tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSCalendarDate/basic.m
> tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSCalendarDate/test00.m
> tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSCalendarDate/test01.m
> tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSCalendarDate/test02.m
> tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSDate/create.m
--- /tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSDate/create.m 2006/11/13 16:50:30 24081
+++ tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSDate/create.m 2006/11/13 17:07:10 24082
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
NSString *val;
NSDate *date1,*date2;
- val = @"2000-10-19";
+ val = @"2000-10-19 00:00:00 +0000";
date1 = [NSDate date];
pass(date1 != nil && [date1 isKindOfClass:[NSDate class]],
"+date works");
I'm not sure about this change to the test suite...
Does this imply that constructing an NSDate with an ISO date without
specifing the time is invalid? I'm afraid that may break some adaptor
implementations where the database fields differentiate between dates
and timestamps.
Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
