On 13 Nov 2006, at 21:09, David Ayers wrote:
--- /tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSDate/create.m 2006/11/13 16:50:30 24081 +++ tests/testsuite/trunk/base/NSDate/create.m 2006/11/13 17:07:10 24082@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ NSString *val; NSDate *date1,*date2; - val = @"2000-10-19"; + val = @"2000-10-19 00:00:00 +0000"; date1 = [NSDate date]; pass(date1 != nil && [date1 isKindOfClass:[NSDate class]], "+date works"); I'm not sure about this change to the test suite... Does this imply that constructing an NSDate with an ISO date without specifing the time is invalid? I'm afraid that may break some adaptor implementations where the database fields differentiate between dates and timestamps.
Yes it does mean that it's invalid ... if you want to create a date from a string without the timestamp then the format should not contain a timestamp part. Such code would not work on MacOS-X (or with the base library with the appropriate bugfix). The method initWithString... is explicitly documented to say that the string must match the format.
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
