>> Can we add 'Writing a Renaissance GUI Builder' to the list of tasks ? I >> volunteer mentoring a student doing that. It's a pretty tough job though, >> so >> only determined people! ;-) > > No, lets not write a new GUI Builder here, >
No, let's not start a new flamewar here, ;-) Your idea could be good and I respect it, feel free to volunteer for it (or for mentoring it) but it's not what I had in mind. :-) I did have in mind writing a Renaissance GUI Builder because I'd like to see a "native" Renaissance GUI Builder where the Renaissance philosophy is implemented natively. I do believe that that will require new user interface/design ideas. Ie, I want auto-layout concepts directly built pervasively everywhere into the basic interface. I feel adding Renaissance to Gorm (which has a completely different philosophy) will end up in a patched system that might somehow work but be ugly and meaningless. I have nothing against a Gorm pluging for Renaissance though. You can mentor a Gorm plugin for Renaissance if you want. I volunteer to mentor "writing a Renaissance GUI Builder" though. ;-) I also suggest we stop the discussion here and accept that we have different views. We all thought a lot about this and we came to different conclusions. Nobody needs to worry anyway as I don't have time to write a Renaissance GUI Builder myself ... unless I stop working on gnustep-make of course. ;-) Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
