Thanks Fred!
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote: > I added these methods. They were actually added in 10.5. > > Am 21.12.2010 22:02, schrieb David Chisnall: >> I've not checked the docs, but I seem to remember that these are convenience >> methods from 10.6, which are all equivalent to the fromView: equivalent with >> nil as the argument - they should be trivial to implement as wrappers like >> that, although it might be cleaner to move the code for calculating the >> transform from base into these methods and make the fromView: variants call >> it if required. If we rely fromViews: methods on fromBase: et al, should we eliminate the need to query a matrix from target view since they already have native matrix to/from window stored? Or is it better for rect conversion between 2 views with different transforms so the result will enclose the target view's rect (ie. w/o converting 3 points)? Or is that not necessary and the result should just enclose the target's convertRectToBase: one, ie. I am not sure why this is important if they are in different hierarchy. >> >> David >> >> On 21 Dec 2010, at 19:24, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote: >> >>> Hi, can we have these methods in view? >>> >>> – convertPointToBase: >>> – convertPointFromBase: >>> – convertSizeToBase: >>> – convertSizeFromBase: >>> – convertRectToBase: >>> – convertRectFromBase: >>> >>> Should just be nil right? >>> Banlu. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > -- .----. Banlu Kemiyatorn /.../\...\ Free Software Yogi |.../ \...| 漫画家 GZSC |../ \..| http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com \/ \/ http://qstx.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
