Riccardo, GNA is a GNU/FSF server just the same as savannah... there's nothing special about savannah at all. The disadvantage to moving the sources back is that people would have to alter their SVN repositories to point to Savannah and it would be disruptive.
Simply moving bug tracking to GNA would reduce confusion as to where the project is located. I would like to get rid of the project on savannah because it causes some amount of confusion when people go looking for GNUstep. GC On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think it is a good idea, we are a gnu idea. I never liked our move > to GNA and if the division irritates you, we should move the sources back > home. It was done back then because GNA had svn support before gnu > savannah... > > my 2 cents, > R > > On 05/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It >> seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the >> other. >> >> The move would simply be to keep the old system active for all >> currently open bugs and to open only new bugs on the new system. >> This would allow a transition to the new system, albeit a slow one. >> >> GC > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
