Hey guys... this isn't a direct response to Nicola, I'm just adding a few more thoughts here.
Simply put we either need GNUstep to be on either savannah or GNA. My concern about moving it back to savannah is that it would be disruptive for anyone who has GNUstep currently checked out. Additionally, I would argue that if we were to make a move back to savannah then a wholesale rethought regarding how the repository is currently structured is in order since the way it is now is somewhat convoluted. Later, GC On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Nicola Pero <nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com> wrote: >> I simply would like to have things in one place. Right now we're >> spread between GNA and Savannah. > > It sounds like a good idea - I support it. > > But, I would recommend that: > > * we put up extensive announcements on the web site, mailing list, etc. > > * we try to migrate over the open bugs. I had a quick look in Savannah, > and you can export > all the bugs as an XML blob. So presumably, you'd export them in that > format, then write a short > script to import them all into the new one (using wget or curl ?). Unless > GNA allows you to import > them in block, or the GNA developers are willing to help. :-) > > * if there's nothing left in savannah, it may be worthwhile putting notices > there pointing people to the GNA > system. > > Thanks > -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
