Fred Kiefer wrote: > I am also a bit surprised about the name of the libobjc used. It is reported > as cygobjc-2.dll. This doesn't sound like the libobjc1 you claim to be using. > Most likely you made a mistake when switching to the old libobjc.
Shouldn't the name of libobjc2 be something like cygobjc2.dll (without the dash)? The name cygobjc-2.dll looks reasonable to me given that libobjc.so was a link to libobjc.so.2 before gcc 4.6. Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
