On 04.08.2011 10:33, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
I am also a bit surprised about the name of the libobjc used. It is reported as
cygobjc-2.dll. This doesn't sound like the libobjc1 you claim to be using. Most
likely you made a mistake when switching to the old libobjc.
Shouldn't the name of libobjc2 be something like cygobjc2.dll (without the
dash)? The name cygobjc-2.dll looks reasonable to me given that libobjc.so was
a link to libobjc.so.2 before gcc 4.6.
Good point, looks like I am wrong here.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
