On 2 Nov 2012, at 19:37, Richard Frith-Macdonald <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2012, at 19:27, Robert Slover wrote: > >> Isn't the 'sudo' failing there? That seems likely to cause problems. >> > Good point ... could it be that sudo is messing up the PATH or somethign > similar so GNUstep (specifically the gnustep-config script) isn't being found? > I've added warnng messages to the makefile in svn, to at least indicate if it > is being read, and which patch it's taking (the standalone or > gnustep-filesystem install). Very good point in fact, indeed it was sudo messing it up! ~/libobjc2$ make GNUmakefile:21: GNUstep found - building for install in the GNUstep filesystem. make: Nothing to be done for `all'. ~/libobjc2$ sudo -E make messages=yes install GNUmakefile:9: GNUstep not found - building for standalone installation. Installing libraries... Creating symbolic links... Installing headers... ~/libobjc2$ sudo su - ~# cd ~tatd2/libobjc2 libobjc2# . /usr/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh libobjc2# make messages=yes install GNUmakefile:21: GNUstep found - building for install in the GNUstep filesystem. echo Installing libraries... … Thanks for your help everyone _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
