adrien commented: 
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1849#note_2003634530


I've started implementing a different design, namely introducing a 
`system-priority-directory`/`GNUTLS_SYSTEM_PRIORITY_DIRECTORY` option. One of 
the main drawback is that a dozen files have to be modified and APIs added.

I'd like to reach an agreement on design. I propose that the file and directory 
contents are parsed as if they were a single file. Files in the directory are 
found using `scandir()` and sorted using `strverscmp()` (which is not 
locale-sensitive). Only files ending with `.conf` are selected (this avoids 
issues with stray or backup files). Does that sounds good?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1849#note_2003634530
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


_______________________________________________
Gnutls-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel
  • [gnutls-de... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities
    • Re: [... Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities

Reply via email to