On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Good evening!
>
> Firstly,.
If I have upset Bernard Rentier and maligned his achievements it was not my
intention and I apologize. There is much to admire about what he and his
repo have done, but it has limitations and I have pointed some of them out.
As I am no longer an employed academic I am debarred from using many of the
contents.


> I don't want to get involved too deeply in such a sterile discussion. It
> takes us nowhere.
>

I have tried very hard on this list to be constructive. It is my nature,
and I am successful on other lists. Here it is difficult to have a balanced
discussion. I shall keep trying because there are almost no placesLiege
have done, b where the general population can make their views known about
Open Access and this is one of the few.


>>I don't want to look overly proud of my accomplishments and those of my
ORBi team, but if I search for Peter Murray-Rust's publications in
Cambridge's IR, I can neither search by author nor by publisher, nor can I
tell what is OA from what is not. It would be nice of him to get things
working a little bit at home before pointing at what he considers our
shortcomings.

It is completely unfair to attack me for the shortcomings of Cambridge
University. I am no longer employed by them (I am retired) and I have never
had any role in running the repository.

>> May I ask him how many papers he published with ACS, how many of these
are OA and how can I access them? Same for the entire University of
Cambridge?


I have not submitted or published any first-author papers with them in the
last five years. (I have been included as a co-author on - I think one or
two - papers published by other authors).

Almost all my first-author papers in the last five years have been Gold
(author-paid) papers - about 15 in the last two and in press. Three have
been published with publishers who agreed to make them freely available and
failed to honour their pledge.

I deliberately publish in Gold journals rather than in ACS. I challenge the
policy of the ACS in my blog so I hope this answers your criticism.

I am glad that you have found my suggestion of a high-level meeting
valuable and I wish you success.

P.

-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Emeritus Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to