Dear Your example is completely right. For me today, one of the biggest problem hindering the progress to find a cure for the covid19 disease is related to copyright. I would therefore like to search for all articles that match "copyright" and "disease", or "copyright" and "virus" or "copyright" and "cure" and many other combination.
Please let me know where I can find enough information to start to use the software you are working on. Best regards, Nicolas Le 1/04/20 à 11:43, Peter Murray-Rust a écrit : > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 6:34 AM Thomas Krichel <kric...@openlib.org > <mailto:kric...@openlib.org>> wrote: > > brent...@uliege.be <mailto:brent...@uliege.be> writes > > In practice, I doubt that access to current research is such a big > issue "NOW" as libraries and open access advocates make it appear to > be. The average academic only reads about one hour a week. In most > cases, if you know that a paper exist and who the author is, you can > contact the author to get the paper. Most authors will comply > because > they crave citations. The open access situation will improve anyway > as the virus crises in the long run will leave institutions too weak > to afford the journal subscription folly. > > The idea that readers want a single paper is absolutely out of date in > the digital century. I want all information on "face mask"s - it's > been requested by a Cambridge colleague. > > >We need urgent expert help for two respiratory surgeons looking for evidence > >of mask effectiveness for typical procedures (collecting samples, > >intubation, and on to more invasive procedures). Happy to put experts in > >touch with them quickly. Evidence based, ideally peer reviewed rather than > >opinion. Thank you. > Our system getpapers+AMI downloaded and analysed over 300 papers for > this query in 5 minutes. > See https://github.com/petermr/openVirus/blob/master/examples/n95/OVERVIEW.md > and > https://github.com/petermr/openVirus/blob/master/examples/n95 for the > actual papers. Anyone can do this on their laptop. For free. (If > anyone says "what about Copyright"? I'll raise the ghost of Queen > Anne and her wrath. Copyright has no place in modern > science/medicine).Except they won't get most of the relevant papers > from Springer, Elsevier, T+F, Wiley, Sage, JSTOR, as my software does > not go behind paywalls. > > > It's more than that. Suppose I want all drugs related to chloroquine. > The hydroxy derivative is called Plaquenil. I didn't know that. But > the software developed by my group in Cambridge DOES know that. So we > need to build an index of the chemistry in the literature. > If we do that we'll have a lawyer's letter from Elsevier or Wiley in 5 > minutes and have my university banning me from Knowledge research, > (Don't think it doesn't happen - it does - > see > https://www.slideshare.net/petermurrayrust/disrupting-the-publisheracademic-complex > for > what they did to Chris Hartgerink , a PhD researcher at Tilburg, > working on reproducible research. And I have other anecdotal evidence > which I can't share.) . > > Again, > Don't dictate what we want. Let us search the whole literature freely. > Then we may need a new generation of publisher tools. And if you > publishers actually have something to offer it will be decided on > merit, not lawyers. > > P. > > > -- > "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I > sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same". > > Peter Murray-Rust > Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics > Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry > University of Cambridge > CB2 1EW, UK > +44-1223-763069 > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL@eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
