Joel has repeatedly stated in this forum that good Science proceeds
by refutation rather than by induction. This statement is as false as
many of his other statements. The idea of falsification in Science
was made popular by Sir Karl Popper, an eccentric British philosopher
of Science. Most scientists and philosophers now believe that this
idea was fundamentally a flawed and eccentric idea. It is widely
accepted that the greatest advances in Science have come from
induction and confirmation. The theory of gravitation, evolution,
genetics, special and general relativity, quantum Physics and
structure of DNA have all been great inductive insights from limited
initial observations, whose validity has grown stronger with each new
confirming instance.

Martin Gardner, a brilliant science writer had recently written a
beautiful article about the demise of Popper's falsification fantasy
in the journal "Skeptical Inquirer". He concluded this article by
saying:

"Popper's great and tireless efforts to expunge the word induction
from scientific and philosophical discourse has utterly failed.
Except for a small but noisy group of British Popperians, induction
is just too firmly embedded in the way philosophers of science and
even ordinary people talk and think.

Confirming instances underlie our beliefs that the Sun will rise
tomorrow, that dropped objects will fall, that water will freeze and
boil, and a million other events. It is hard to think of another
philosophical battle so decisively lost."

I give below a few other excerpts from this article:

"A SKEPTICAL LOOK AT KARL POPPER

by

Martin Gardner

Sir Karl Popper, who died in 1994, was widely regarded as England's
greatest philosopher of science since Bertrand Russell. Indeed a
philosopher of worldwide eminence. Today his followers among
philosophers of science are a diminishing minority, convinced that
Popper's vast reputation is enormously inflated. I agree. I believe
that Popper's reputation was based mainly on this persistent but
misguided efforts to restate common-sense views in a novel language
that is rapidly becoming out of fashion."


"Popper recognized � but dismissed as unimportant � that every
falsification of a conjecture is simultaneously a confirmation of an
opposite conjecture, and every conforming instance of a conjecture is
a falsification of an opposite conjecture.

To scientists and philosophers outside the Popperian fold, science
operates mainly by induction (confirmation), and also and less often
by disconfirmation (falsification). Its language is almost always one
of induction. If Popper bet on a certain horse to win a race, and the
horse won, you would not expect him to shout, "Great! My horse failed
to lose!"


"Ernest Nagel, Columbia University's famous philosopher of science,
in his Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and
History of Science (1979), summed it up this way: "[Popper's]
conception of the role of falsification . . . is an
oversimplification that is close to being a caricature of scientific
procedures.""


"It's not so much that Popper disagreed with Carnap and other
inductivists as that he restated their views in a bizarre and
cumbersome terminology.

When Popper wrote "Logik der Forschung," he was barely thirty.
Despite its flawed center, it was full of good ideas, from perhaps
the most brilliant of the bright young philosophers associated with
the Vienna Circle. But where the others continued to learn, develop
and in time exert a lasting influence on the philosophical tradition,
Popper knew better. He refused to revise his falsificationism, and so
condemned himself to a lifetime in the service of a bad idea."

Cheers,

Santosh







=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-W-E-B---S-I-T-E-=-=- To 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe from GoaNet  |  http://www.goacom.com/goanet
================================================================== For (un)subscribing 
or for help, Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Dont want so many e=mails?  Join GoaNet-Digest instead !
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Help support 
non-commercial projects in Goa by advertizing!!
        *               *               *               *
                        Your ad here !!

Reply via email to