It took me some time to decide how I should be responding to the various exchanges on this line of discussion. The reason is that while we can definitely appreciate the candour with which Ben has set out his experience, I am a little puzzled with the rationalisation that seems to be floating around.

We have discussed, very rightly too, about the way the present dispensation in Goa is trying to suppress the media. But it would seem to me, based on what Ben wrote, that the rot has a long origin and is not of recent vintage. And it would seem to me that some on Goanet do not find that aspect disturbing as they rightly find the present situation disconcerting. I would have thought that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

What has upset me is that it would seem that the journalist operate in an environment which seems to make them not be professionally unbiased. This upsets me because, as I had said earlier, I think the media has an important role to play in a democracy.

Recently, the Nobel Laureate Prof Amartya Sen ("Democracy and Its Global Roots", The New Republic, October 6, 2003) wrote: "Indeed, voting is only one way -- though certainly a very important way -- of making public discussions effective, when the opportunity to vote is combined with the opportunity to speak, and to listen, without fear. The force and the reach of elections depend critically on the opportunity for open public discussion."

Given the rationalisation of Ben's motivation and actions, particularly by as senior journalist like Fred, would indicate to me that Prof Sen's condition for a functioning democracy has not been in existence for a long time. Of course, we should try and recover it, if it is lost. But this can happen only when we do not indulge in rationalisation but in admitting the facts as they are. If Lambert's whetting of editorials by the owners of the journal he was writing is to be even obliquely justified, then surely it would be difficult to condemn an editorial of any journal to be similarly whetted today.

Of course, two wrongs do not make a right. But we can come to this only when we clearly admit that there was a wrong done earlier. Otherwise, we lose the moral right of condemning the wrong today. After all, the one doing today's wrong can turn around and say that he/she is following the example set earlier.

To emphasise my point, let me quote what Shobha De ("Mumbai-Lite??", The Times of India, September 14, 2003) wrote recently: "A week ago, I called a prominent politician a 'goonda' during a high-powered private dinner. A well-wisher advised me to zip up my mouth in future: "It's okay to say these things in Mumbai to another Mumbaikar. But don't ever express your views so frankly in the presence of outsiders. That 'goonda' is an incredibly influential man, a vindictive man." I had noticed the noncommittal silence that had followed my comment. A silence that was as eloquent as it was sickening. I naively used to believe that here in Mumbai we were free to speak our minds without fear of political vendetta. I want to continue to believe in that freedom. For, at the end of the day, that's all one can invest in, count on...and await juicy dividends. Commerce rules in Mumbai. It always has. Rather robust commerce than communal corrosion. Mumbai counts."

I think she was talking about a minister in the present ruling alliance in Maharashtra. Would I be naïve if I say that if Shobha does follow her well-wisher's advise, she has forfeited her right to condemn any other person? If so, then how will the 'goonda' know that the people think of him/her as a 'goonda'?

Some will say that I am an idealistic person. But is not idealism necessary for a healthy democracy?

If I have touched on a sensitive matter in an insensitive manner, I would like to apologise right here.


Sachin Phadte


_________________________________________________________________
Celebrate Shakti. Send money to loved ones in India. http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/navaratri/ Have a joyous Navratri.



##########################################################################
# Send submissions for Goanet to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # PLEASE remember to stay on-topic (related to Goa), and avoid top-posts #
# More details on Goanet at http://joingoanet.shorturl.com/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others #
##########################################################################

Reply via email to