Excerpt:
An interim report last September, written by former ISG head Charles Duelfer, 
will
largely serve as the group�s final conclusions. It said that Saddam not only 
had no
weapons of mass destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no
capability of making any either.

Few changes will be made to the document, Mr McClellan said.

The Duelfer document contradicted virtually all the pre-war claims from London 
and
Washington about Saddam possessing biological and chemical weapons, and
reconstituting Iraq�s nuclear programme.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-1437379,00.html

January 12, 2005 

Bush abandons hunt for Saddam's WMD
By Jenny Booth, Times Online
 
 
 
The fruitless hunt for Saddam Hussein�s alleged weapons of mass destruction has 
come
to an end, the White House confirmed today.

 
 
Officials with the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), the body established to find the 
very
weapons which justified the war, have reported that no weapons have been found.

In fact - contrary to the intelligence that President Bush and Tony Blair 
conveyed
to their respective nations in making the case for invading Iraq  - Saddam did 
not
have the capability to make WMDs since 1991, the inspectors found.

The ISG returned to the US last month amid growing dangers from insurgents in 
Iraq.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said there was no longer an active
search for weapons.

"There may be a couple, a few people, that are focused on that," he said, but 
added
that the search had largely concluded.

He went on: "If they have any reports of (weapons of mass destruction) obviously
they�ll continue to follow up on those reports. A lot of their mission is 
focused
elsewhere now."

An interim report last September, written by former ISG head Charles Duelfer, 
will
largely serve as the group�s final conclusions. It said that Saddam not only 
had no
weapons of mass destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no
capability of making any either.

Few changes will be made to the document, Mr McClellan said.

The Duelfer document contradicted virtually all the pre-war claims from London 
and
Washington about Saddam possessing biological and chemical weapons, and
reconstituting Iraq�s nuclear programme.

An intelligence official told the Washington Post that the chances of weapons 
being
hidden inside Iraq, or having been shipped out of the country before the war, 
were
very small.

The search was called off amid the growing insurgency and risk of attack or 
kidnap
in Iraq.

The Iraq Survey Group, made up of some 1,200 military and intelligence 
specialists
and support staff, spent nearly two years searching military installations,
factories and laboratories whose equipment and products might be converted 
quickly
to making weapons.

Every suspect site in Iraq has been inspected by the ISG or plundered by 
insurgents
and looters.

Most of the suspects have also been rounded up and questioned.
 
"We�ve talked to so many people that someone would have said something," an
intelligence official told the Washington Post.

"We received nothing that contradicts the picture we�ve put forward. It�s 
possible
there is a supply some place, but what is much more likely is that we will find 
a
greater substantiation of the picture that we�ve already put forward." 
 
The ISG still exists and is based at the Pentagon under Marine Corps Brigadier
General Joseph McMenamin. It now concentrates mainly on counter-insurgency work.

The ISG has urged the Pentagon to release scientists who have been questioned at
length about Iraq�s weapons capabilities. They are General Amir Saadi, a liaison
between Saddam�s government and UN inspectors; Rihab Taha, a biologist 
nicknamed "Dr
Germ" in the west; her husband, Amir Rashid, the former oil minister; and Huda
Amash, another biologist who earned the nickname "Mrs Anthrax".

The ISG determined that none of the scientists had been involved in Iraqi 
weapons
programmes since the first Gulf War.
 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to