Hi JC,

Thank you for your comments on the homosexuality and the transition from normal 
to the abnormal questions. As a pediatrician, you would be in a good situation 
to enlighten us as to when something is 'normal' a 'variation' or a 
'birth-defect' or an abnormality or a pathology.  Hence your two questions are 
very pertinent.
 
1. I do not know the incidence of homosexuality. Not only would I like to know 
the answer to that question but also its incidence in various ethnic / 
geographical groups.  It would also be interesting to see the incidence by 
every decade.  Yes homosexuals are coming out of the closet (being detected).  
But is there an absolute increase with every decade as in the case of some 
cancers?
 
In the field of cancer, it is my understanding that the INCIDENCE of an 
inherited cancer which determines if it is 'sporadic', 'familial' or 'genetic' 
transmitted.  And not the explanation of phenotype etc as presented by my 
friend Santosh.  But this is not to knock down his scientific credentials as a 
neuro-scientist but just to say that different specialties in medicine approach 
the subject differently.  We do not all follow the shrinks.
 
2. Your second question, I am more sure of dialoguing.  To argue SEPARATE 
acceptable sexual behavior for homosexuals (in public or behind closed doors) 
is to either give them special dispensation or discriminate against them 
compared to heterosexuals.  We have to use the same basic principles/ 
guidelines to define socially acceptable homosexual behavior as we use to 
define acceptable heterosexual behavior.  I have discussed this in my two prior 
posts and which most have avoided for obvious reasons.  
 
And of course that behavior may change - as we start on a slippery slope. 
Nudism or a 'dental floss' outfit is accepted  behavior / attire on the beaches 
in the French Riviera but not on the beaches of Goa. And because it is OK on 
the Riviera, it is not accepted on the banks of the Seine or in the shopping 
malls of Paris.

Hence native Goans have to develope their own socially acceptable homosexual 
and heterosexual behavior and not what other societies do or what Diaspora 
Goans think, not-with-standing the science.  Or else it will become like the 
nudist beach saga in Goa.   Nudism (on the beach or anywhere) has also never 
hurt anyone with their eyes closed or open. :=))  

Frankly native Goans should learn from western society instead of necessarily 
imitating it.  Sex - whether Homosexual and Heterosexual has become 
Recreational and a one-night-stand,  rather that what it was considered to be.  
That is why Santosh can ask the question what negative personal or social 
effects does 'homosexual behavior' have? 

3. Do you think same-sex pedophiles is a sexual-behavioral extension of adult 
homosexuality or is it a different 'kettle of fish'?  Now I know it is criminal 
and yes it is not Adult and Consensual  etc.:=)). But I am talking of the 
pedophile.
 
4.  As an aside, a few years ago at a major breast cancer meeting there was 
participation of breast cancer 'patients and activists'.  A physician presented 
a paper on treatment of advanced breast cancer. He said, "Forty percent of 
women failed the treatment." (not bad for advanced cancer) 
 
An 'activist' in the question period took him to task on the wording of his 
presentation (to a hushed audience). Her point:  The patients did not fail the 
treatment. The treatment failed the patients. Think of it.
 
Are we calling homosexuals normal and pedophile criminals just because we 
cannot treat them?  Perhaps a 100 years from now we may have the answer.  Will 
our grandchildren admire us or laugh at our ignorance (like we do today to some 
past scientific concepts)? 

Time will tell. Not Today's Science or Religion!
Regards, GL


Reply via email to