--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a change is used because we need a change in > policy. The present anti-terrorism policy is not > effective in catching those who are responsible for > the past and ongoing acts of terrorism. Those in > power are incompetent at catching Bin Laden, Al- > Zawahiri, Al-Zarqawi, etc, and bringing them to > justice. They are only good for making contrived > excuses and rationalizations of various kinds. > Mario replies: This is a classic example of a gratuitous "cheap-shot", "making contrived excuses and rationalizations of various kinds" while accusing others of doing so, which identifies one as opponent of US policy in the war against terrorism, pointing out something that has not yet been achieved in the middle of a major world wide war, against terrorists who hide in and among the population, wear no uniforms and do not follow any recognized conventions of warfare, while ignoring everything that has been and is being achieved.
