I just noticed these "unbiased" responses from Roland on Goanet. Looks like he has different levels or standards of corruption and crookedness in his unbiased mind. Illegal profiteering from massive fraud and forgery does not reach the threshold if it happens during the Portuguese rule. The same for theft of Rs. 35 lakhs from the taxpayer's money.
But how about torture and murder in police custody, and falsification of the autopsy report by the government? What do you think? Would it measure up? I for one would really like to know what his "unbiased" threshold for corruption and crookedness is in the Portuguese "system". It also appears that names of Portuguese public officials are special. They get sullied if reported by the press in connection with allegations of public corruption. Perhaps, sanctification and worship of the Portuguese administrators does not amount to being pro-Portuguese. Cheers, Santosh > On Monday, April 7, 2014 10:46 AM, roland.francis <roland.fran...@ymail.com> > wrote: > > Actually dear doctor your examples of criminal acts of inflated rice > > manifests > are so sketchy that even I, once misty eyed holiday going Goan would hesitate > to > tell this to my own brother (if I had one). > > What will be your next example if I push you for a worse case? Over- > manifesting imported Japanese toys coming into Goa for Christmas, or perhaps > busting the blockade by providing Indian customs officials State 555 > cigarettes > and Black Label scotch to look the other way while beef and vegetables came > in > from Belgaum and Karwar? > > Sad you have to scrape the bottom of the law-breaking barrel to show up the > Portuguese in a poor light. > > Roland. > Roland Francis wrote: > >Over to you Senhor Gabriel de Figuereido. Don't let this sully against Senhor >Ismail Gracias another >Lotlecar go unanswered. > >Roland
