Roland Francis: Even if you disclaimed education, merely being informed and aware as you claim to be, should have convinced you of the correct stand without the necessity of self doubts on the subject of HIV infected children viz they have the full rights of all children including access to education without discrimination and harassment. There can be no second thoughts about this under the guise of "sincerely analysing my reactions". If you think like this, no wonder people with a little less than your level of "information and awareness" could do what they did in Rivona.
Cecil: Unlike you Roland, I am not perfect and not always sure that my reactions are correct. I try to walk a mile in the other person's shoes before passing judgement. "All men should strive to learn before they die what they are running from, And to, and why." ~James Thurber ---------------- Roland: If I am blinkered and negative than your phrase is extremely naive not to be termed divisive. Pity a "writer" could not have said it more clearly. No matter how you mask or spin it, the phrase could have been unambiguous with "Our Children, Our Children's Children", if that is what you meant. Cecil: As I said before I have used the phrase before, for other causes, to good effect. Only a convoluted mind could interpret it as you did. If you feel your English is superior you can please coin slogans and sell them. Though I doubt anyone would buy, "Our Children, Our Children's Children". It sounds smug and selfish. ----------------- Roland: My last word on this subject. Cecil: It better be. You have forgotten the issue at hand and are trying to play with words and defend your stupid assumptions. But I must admit I was looking forward to "Roland's Lessons in Proper English Usage for Copywriting Professionals." Cheers! ==========
