I happened to meet an advocate friend in Panjim, and I enquired how much of the information that Aires provides in emails is correct. He tells me around 70% of the info provided is correct. Well, here is the question: Which 30% of the information is incorrect? I wished all of Aires articles provided in goanet was 100% accurate.
On 12/30/14, Jose <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 30, 2014, at 1:00 AM, Sam Furtado <[email protected]> wrote: > "Well, well Mr. Jose Colaco you maybe right to an extent as per your per se, > but these things need retrospection before anything goes in print and > opens!to public viewing. > > My only concern was to vehemently supporting Mr. Aires Rodrigues being a > true Goan Blooded person, nevertheless, nature will take its own course to > proof who is right or wrong or otherwise?" > > Dear Sam Furtado, > > My apologies for not being able to comprehend the above from you. My fault. > > I agree with you, IF however, you are stating the following: > > a: All of us ( Aires included) should verify our information before making > bold statements. > > b: And IF we have made an inadvertent error, All of us ( Aires included) > should withdraw the erroneous information. After all, we all make errors. > > c: IF we stubbornly refuse to correct our errors, it shows our inability to > make corrections while we ourselves are preaching to others. > > d: From my reading, there were at least two major errors (1) Navy helicopter > (2) Manohar Parrikar's 'direction' ( I paraphrase ). > > e: It provides ALL of us with another lesson, and one which lawyers ought to > know ie Use the term 'reportedly' or 'allegedly'. > > In conclusion: the important point of impropriety or the future possibility > of a Quid pro Quo was diluted. As an adjunct, PN: Doctors are advised NOT to > accept freebies or gifts from Pharmaceutical Companies. > > jc > Adherer to "NO FREE LUNCHES" > http://www.propublica.org/series/dollars-for-docs > > ONLY for reading reference: > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1320a-7b > > (b) Illegal remunerations > (1) Whoever knowingly and willfully solicits or receives any remuneration > (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly > or covertly, in cash or in kind— > >
