Do we need any percentile of analysis on the subject now, to understand the statistics in coefficient of regression or probability Sir? Just let's call it; "A Slip between the Cup and the Lip" and end the matter there. Brewing further could spoil the broth.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jose Agnelo do Rosario Pinto < [email protected]> wrote: > I happened to meet an advocate friend in Panjim, and I enquired how > much of the information that Aires provides in emails is correct. He > tells me around 70% of the info provided is correct. Well, here is the > question: Which 30% of the information is incorrect? I wished all of > Aires articles provided in goanet was 100% accurate. > > On 12/30/14, Jose <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2014, at 1:00 AM, Sam Furtado <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Well, well Mr. Jose Colaco you maybe right to an extent as per your per > se, > > but these things need retrospection before anything goes in print and > > opens!to public viewing. > > > > My only concern was to vehemently supporting Mr. Aires Rodrigues being a > > true Goan Blooded person, nevertheless, nature will take its own course > to > > proof who is right or wrong or otherwise?" > > > > Dear Sam Furtado, > > > > My apologies for not being able to comprehend the above from you. My > fault. > > > > I agree with you, IF however, you are stating the following: > > > > a: All of us ( Aires included) should verify our information before > making > > bold statements. > > > > b: And IF we have made an inadvertent error, All of us ( Aires included) > > should withdraw the erroneous information. After all, we all make errors. > > > > c: IF we stubbornly refuse to correct our errors, it shows our inability > to > > make corrections while we ourselves are preaching to others. > > > > d: From my reading, there were at least two major errors (1) Navy > helicopter > > (2) Manohar Parrikar's 'direction' ( I paraphrase ). > > > > e: It provides ALL of us with another lesson, and one which lawyers > ought to > > know ie Use the term 'reportedly' or 'allegedly'. > > > > In conclusion: the important point of impropriety or the future > possibility > > of a Quid pro Quo was diluted. As an adjunct, PN: Doctors are advised > NOT to > > accept freebies or gifts from Pharmaceutical Companies. > > > > jc > > Adherer to "NO FREE LUNCHES" > > http://www.propublica.org/series/dollars-for-docs > > > > ONLY for reading reference: > > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1320a-7b > > > > (b) Illegal remunerations > > (1) Whoever knowingly and willfully solicits or receives any remuneration > > (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, > overtly > > or covertly, in cash or in kind— > > > > >
