On 3 April 2015 at 15:03, Jose <[email protected]> wrote: > > COMMENT: > > The matter of this unsecured loan, Gabe and GOA (UK) comes up again.....in > time for the Ressurection. > > The mere fact that Gabe repeatedly raises this topic in a public forum - > indicates that something truly is amiss. > > I do not know the details of this case. However, I'd say this GENERICALLY: > > 1: Unless specifically Written Off by the lender, A Loan (be it unsecured > or not) ought to be paid off according to the terms of the loan. > > 2: Those who sign-off on the receipt and spending of the loan monies, have > the Moral Responsibility to organise to find means and ways to Pay Off this > Loan. I wonder IF the Theft Act (1968) as amended by the 2006 Act applies ! > > 3: Whether the lender has the funds to absorb the 'loss' or not - is > immaterial. > > 4: Not revealing the names of this loan in any Historical Account (present > or future) even IF the Loan has been paid off is akin to Revisionism. > > Back to this specific loan: I wonder IF Gabe et al were contacted (by the > writer) for info relating to the said loan. Not sure IF the writer was even > made aware of the lenders who may have suffered personal financial losses - > as a result of this loaning of the funds. > > While I wish NOT to be involved in internal UK GOA politics, this matter > is now in the public domain. ALL Goans should wish it to be settled and > settled quickly. > > Even if he has done this before, I wish Gabe writes an impartial account > of the issue - offering the other side an opportunity to counter-point any > claims Gabe makes. > > jc > > RESPONSE: I am glad that you mentioned that this matter has come up before; in that case Mrs Selma Carvalho knew fully well the details of the loan but chose to make light of the matter.
-- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
