At a time when armed terrorists have infiltrated into the Indian air force
station in Pathankot and have been attacking the security of our Country,
it is sad to see few local opposition leaders playing petty politics and
questioning the competence and abilities of Mr. Manohar Parrikar, by far
one of India’s most pro-active defence Ministers. In times of crisis the
nation must come together and stand together. After India – Pakistan war
which resulted in creation of Bangladesh, Vajpayee praised Indira Gandhi
even equating her to Goddess Durga. Constructive criticism is good and must
be there. But loose statements made on the basis of rhetoric are not as
these can affect the morale of those who are fighting and giving their
lives to a tough battle. Today, Terrorism is a worldwide phenomenon which
is striking the very roots of progress. When France was attacked the whole
world joined them in solidarity but when our own Country is attacked, there
are some who are doing the reverse. Why? That a person from our humble
shores has gone on to become the defence minister of our country and is
working in such difficult environment and terrain should be a matter of
great pride as well as concern to us. If we cannot join him, let us at
least support him and support the rest who are protecting us and our
borders.

Terrorism will not tell when and where it will strike and which place the
Defence Minister must be at a particular time. It can strike anyhow and
anywhere as we witnessed in Mumbai or in America during the 9/11 twin
towers strikes. What is important is how the Country deals with it and how
terrorists can be neutralized with minimum collateral damage and
casualties. If Mr. Parrikar comes and visits his own State and gives time
to his own people, even that is being criticised. Is it a fair criticism?
Parrikar’s position allows him to spend his weekends in luxury but he does
not and prefers to live a simple live. For all purposes, let there be a
constructive debate on the functioning of our Country’s security and on our
defence minister. After all, so many lives of our own are at stake. But
such debates must be based on facts and not on rhetoric.

Where was the ministry before and where is it today? A fair analysis has to
be done. Previously, there used to be bureaucratic inertia in dealing with
most defence matters but through sincere and spirited efforts, one can see
rapid acceleration in modernisation of projects now.  Many long pending
works are getting cleared in this sensitive Ministry in a time bound
manner. The procurement of Rafale jets which were in cold storage for close
to a decade is no mean achievement. So too the OROP pension scheme which
again was lingering for years. Development of indigenous aircrafts,
missiles and nuclear ballistic submarines, procurement of ammunition and
other defence requirements,  etc are few other works which he has
fast-tracked within the short time that he has been at the helm.

Sincerity, administrative abilities, work dedication and honesty are
qualities which one associates Mr. Parrikar with. Pathankot has been more
about intelligence failure and lack of coordination between different
intelligence agencies. Blaming any one individual is just plain politics
and will lead nowhere. The task before our honourable defence minister is
to streamline the entire intelligence network to minimize such intelligence
lapses. Modernizing India’s defence forces and turning India into a strong
military power are few other challenges. No doubt the task is daunting and
challenging but Mr. Parrikar has an abundance of sincerity and
administrative acumen to address this issue which is of critical national
importance.

Warm regards,
Sandeep Heble
Panaji-Goa
9326129171

Reply via email to