Whatever the theological reasons, Pilate was the authority given to him. He acted politically to save himself from being dislodged despite he believed and said so that he finds Jesus is not guilty on any counts brought against Jesus. Politics was prevalent even in those days, it means.
Eugene On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Roland Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > Nelson de Chinchinim, > In humility, I point out that the dastardly brutal act of murder to which > you refer, was ordained by the father of the victim in question, Pontius > Pilate being only one of the instruments. > > Roland Francis > Toronto. > > > > Over the centuries why does the Catholic Church remember him in the > > CREED, along side with Jesus, there by keeping the memory of this > > unpardonable, > > unforgivable villain of crucifixion. Do we still need to glorify him and > > celebrate his existence recalling his name for this dastardly act of > brutal > > murder by devoutly reciting his name.? It is in the fitness of things, > > keeping with the sentiments of the faithful, the creed be modified and > name > > of Pontius Pilate deleted. How can we continue to relish his ignomious > > memory.? The sacred prayer ,creed that Catholics recite so often must > not > > have place for such a disgraceful ,tyrant, oppressive ruler in the creed > > > > Nelson Lopes Chinchinim >
